Where are the Climate Activists on Transportation?

In 2010, the Michigan Department of Transportation was planning on spending a few billion dollars widening some highways through Metro Detroit, my homeland. MDOT (and the regional council of governments supporting them) faced community pushback, but in the end, plans went ahead.

While Michigan’s situation is particularly sad given the state’s population exodus and Detroit’s lack of a regional transit system, it’s the same story across the country. Despite the growth of transit-friendly cities, and despite evidence that building more capacity fails to decrease congestion, taxpayers continue to hemorrhage billions to grow our highway system.

But the most significant downside to all this receives scant attention: the climate impacts. Transportation has surpassed electricity as the country’s primary source of greenhouse gas emissions.

Meanwhile, oil pipelines in the US have galvanized the climate movement like nothing else. From Keystone XL to Dakota Access, pipelines have become a symbol of the world we want to move away from. But the leaders of these movements rarely (if ever) mention transportation, even though the oil running through these pipelines will be used primarily for transportation. Instead, they tout clean energy:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Reducing transportation emissions is more complicated that swapping one energy source for another: it requires us to zone for density and mixed uses; grow funding and accessibility for public transit, walking, and bicycling; fix the federal transportation bill; scale up EV adoption and shared mobility; use alternative fuels and efficient technology for aviation and shipping; and lots more.

The climate community’s lackluster approach to transportation translates into lackluster political leadership. Already, Hillary Clinton has indicated that she’ll increase highway capacity as part of her infrastructure plan if elected president. Highway proposals should be scrutinized as vehemently as coal plants: both lock in emissions for years to come.

A wonky list of policy demands doesn’t mean that movement-building isn’t possible around transportation. Just look at what the Netherlands was able to accomplish when people fed up with traffic fatalities took to the streets in the 1970s. Pithy, straightforward campaigns like Strong Towns’ #NoNewRoads and U.S. PIRG/Environment America’s new report 50 Steps to Carbon-Free Transportation are the kinds of things climate activists should be able to get behind. When transit’s on the ballot, as it is in communities across the US this election, climate hawks should get out the vote. And advocates should scale up solutions that help address emissions in other sectors like agriculture too. It’s time to start thinking bigger than clean energy.

2 thoughts on “Where are the Climate Activists on Transportation?

  1. Michael Weiser says:

    Instead of widening roads, a much better option is to build, lease, rent, share, buy, and drive 100% electric, single-width, highway-capable, standard doors, and standard windows cars. Once thin car drivers discover the significant speed and convenience attributes that driving their narrow cars to work provides, they would stop commuting in cars with side by side seating and, thus, end the need to widen the roads.
    The only thin highway-capable in existence today is the Tango from http://www.commutercars.com.

    Like

  2. Ryan says:

    Good question, good point! The Union of Concerned Scientists, strong advocates for climate solutions, promote electric cars but don’t even mention more fundamental transportation solutions (at least as of the last time I checked). A more recent example is Leonardo DiCaprio: http://www.planetizen.com/node/89161/why-disconnect-climate-change-and-urban-density. My guess is that movement leaders don’t want to highlight solutions that the public might perceive as changing their lifestyles. I would argue that if we design our cities and infrastructure well, we can enjoy a better(!) lifestyle with cars playing a much smaller role than they now do — and that even as many of us do that, the car-dependent neighborhoods that others cherish so much will still be around for a long time (as there are so very many of them).

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s